December 6th, 2025, First Saturday.

“But blessed are your eyes, because they see, and your ears, because they hear.”

~Matthew 13:16~

In a group email, from this past June 19th, 2025, Titled “everything is fake and gay”, I relayed the following news:

This email is partly for my friend Wynn, who runs the official investigation with Dr Peter Chojnowski, about Sister Lucia of Fatima being replaced by an unknown imposter, likely sometime before 1960. Their website is PHENOMENAL and through several scientists a 100% verdict was reached that there were “two” Sister Lucys. I always deep down believed this… because… common sense just told me that my eyes were not lying to me. 

Dr’s recent visit to Ohio was a success as the coroners also ruled that there indeed were two different people. Enough with the eye roll worthy claims that Sister’s writings were manipulated. They weren’t. The truth is the REAL Sister Lucia was likely the first martyr of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and she’s my hero. I hope to follow in her heroic footsteps. Please check out Wynn’s recent video on the scientific evidence (“trust the science”)… until the science makes you uncomfortable:

Website:

Home

Speaking of senses, I thought it so fitting that shortly after I “sensed” the urge to keep writing for Mary, that I received an email from my friend Wynn, again, asking me to write another article in defense of the real Sister Lucia of Fatima and Dr. Chojnowski, because just recently former journalist from Church Militant, Christine Niles, posted a second video on why she believes, contrary to evidence, Sister Lucia was NOT replaced. She posted a video on this topic two years ago here and her analysis was ripped apart in the comments section (for good reason). The Church and her members were not attacking Christine’s character, they were attacking her journalism, and rightfully so. The first comment alone reads:

“What kind of fool do you think I am? This was not journalism.”

You know what is so refreshing about that comment? It just goes to show that people are finally understanding what gaslighting is, and we are done with the games. The jig is up. This comment makes me smile:

I see photos of Cardinal Ratzinger when he was young and later years… I can see he is Ratzinger. I can’t say the same thing about Sister Lucy.

And lastly:

“Christine Niles… If you truly believe there wasn’t any fake Sister Lucy… please make an open LIVE debate with Dr. Peter Chojnowski… Will you do that????”

I doubt she will. You always know what side the Truth is on by the one willing to debate. Christine won’t debate Doc. This is a debate I would LOVE to see happen, and I sincerely hope it does. In Christine’s most recent video, from November 26th, 2025, she revisited her former claim and merely doubled down that Sister Lucia was not replaced by an unknown imposter here. This comment left on the video exactly sums up the words of Our Lord I started this post with about using our eyes and ears:

“I’m not wasting a half hour. I asked the AI summary tool if Christine Niles admits to being completely wrong in her video “debunking” the fake Sister Lucy story. It says no, in fact she doubles down. We have eyes and ears. You remain a “journalist” I do not trust until your words match what my eyes see and ears hear. This is a giant scandal and JPII “the great” paraded around with her. It is not the same Lucia. There has never been peace since the First World War, nonetheless the Second. There was a window of controlled narrative “fake peace” through gatekeepers in the media, like you. Now we have access to everything. I recommend the channel Sister Lucy Truth. I trust Dr. C and facial recognition software that entirely rules out that it is the same woman.”

In a blog post I wrote many years ago, I did a little “test” on my Mom and wrote about her reaction to this topic. She is not very familiar with the Fatima children or message at all; she was raised Catholic but is very new to Marian apparitions. Knowing she would be a non prejudiced contestant, I took these below images of Lucia and said, “do you think this is the same person?” I was very open to whatever answer she would give me; she paused and I saw her face grimace as she said, “NO! Not at all… why, are they?”

At the time I said I was still not entirely sure because I wrestled with the topic, but she countered even that and said, “it does not take a genius to see that those are two different people.” I think a test like this alone would be a perfect “experiment”, if you will, to perform on the public. I challenge someone to take a sign with the real Sister and fake “sister” and ask random people on the side of the road, who know nothing about the Fatima Seer, and see what reactions you get by simply asking non Catholics if this is the same person:

I am willing to bet everything I have (which isn’t much) that most, if not all, people with no bias whatsoever would have absolutely no hesitation in admitting these are two different people. Putting the mountains of evidence aside (see footnotes and video links), as well as the conclusion reached by the coroners, this really just boils back down to common sense and basic discernment. HE GAVE US FIVE SENSES: TOUCH, HEARING, TASTE, SIGHT AND SMELL. The very discernment Our Lord preached to His sheep all over the New Testament.

It is discernment that teaches us to distinguish the Voice from the Shepherd verses the voices of the strangers, wolves and hirelings. We do this by exorcising our senses. How do we do that? WE USE THEM. This is also exactly why Our Lord encouraged His apostles to go and relate to John what they had “seen and heard” (Luke 7:22). He said nothing about needing a PHD to use our intellects for His glory. He chose simple fishermen. He CONSTANTLY asks us to challenge our MINDS by all the mere questions He ASKED His apostles. BUT WHO DO YOU SAY THAT I AM? (Matthew 16:13).

Where do I draw my discernment from? Our Lady of Seven Sorrows, the 7 Gifts of the Holy Ghost and the 5 Senses of the Holy Face of Jesus. I have prayed the Seven Sorrows Rosary nearly every day since 2014 (besides my time in Carmel because I was not allowed to pray it; yes I am serious), when I visited Rwanda, Kibeho where Our Lady appeared and promoted this Rosary, but it was only recently that I began assigning the 7 Gifts of the Holy Ghost to a specific Sorrow of Mary when introducing Her mystery. I do this every day, now, and I am 100% confident that it has sharpened my discernment and helps me make INSTANT decisions and INSTANT recognitions:

1.) First Sorrow of Mary, Prophecy of Simeon. Fruit of the mystery: sorrow for sin. Gift of the Holy Ghost: FEAR OF GOD.

“The Gift of Holy Fear, or Fear of God, is actually the foundation of all the other gifts. It drives sin from the heart, because it fills us with reverence either for the justice of God or for the Divine Majesty.”

2.) Second Sorrow of Mary, Flight into Egypt. Fruit of the mystery: courage. Gift of the Holy Ghost: FORTITUDE.

“The Gift of Fortitude is a permanent power which the Holy Ghost communicates to our will to assist us in overcoming the difficulties which might deter us in the practice of what is right.”

3.) Third Sorrow of Mary, Loss of the Child Jesus in Jerusalem. Fruit of the mystery: Jesus cleaves to His wife, Jerusalem. Gift of the Holy Ghost: COUNSEL.

“The Gift of Counsel is a light given by the Holy Ghost, by means of which our practical intellect sees and judges rightly both what should be done in individual cases and the best means to do it.”

4.) Fourth Sorrow of Mary, Meeting of Jesus and Mary on the way of calvary. Fruit of the mystery: love of Jesus and Mary and Their Holy Faces. Fruit of the Holy Ghost: UNDERSTANDING.

“The Gift of Understanding enlightens us by shedding a clear, searching and extraordinary light on the meaning of revealed truth, and by giving us a certitude that what God has revealed means such and such a SENSE and no other.”

5.) Fifth Sorrow of Mary, Crucifixion of Our Lord. Fruit of the mystery: self-denial. Gift of the Holy Ghost: WISDOM.

“The Gift of Wisdom is an illumination of the Holy Ghost, thanks to which our intellect is able to look at revealed truths in their more sublime light, to the greater joy of our souls.”

6.) Sixth Sorrow of Mary, Taking of Jesus Down from the Cross and is Placed in Mary’s Arms. Fruit of the mystery: purity. Gift of the Holy Ghost: PIETY.

“The Gift of Piety awakens in our souls an inclination and readiness to glorify God as Our Father and to have a filial confidence in Him.”

7.) Seventh Sorrow of Mary, the Burial of Our Lord. Fruit of the mystery: holy life and a holy death. Gift of the Holy Ghost: KNOWLEDGE.

“The Gift of Knowledge is a supernatural light of the Holy Ghost which shows us the CREDIBILITY and ACCEPTABILITY of revealed truths, even for reasons which are based only on the order of creation.”

Notice how many times I italicized the word “LIGHT”. The Holy Ghost acts like a light switch in the house of our soul. And we all know there are only two options for light switches: on or off. With the Holy Ghost, He is telling you, “yes” or “no”. It’s really that simple. Simple as doves and wise as serpents?

The season of Pentecost and its 24 Sundays “after” is my favorite time of the year; I believe it is Our Lord’s as well because it makes up more than half of the liturgical calendar and it was wiped out of the New Mass, bogus ordo entirely and replaced with “ordinary time”. BORING. It’s not called “ordinary” for nothing! Don’t tell me this isn’t an all out attack on the Third Person of the Blessed Trinity and may I remind readers that sins committed against the Paraclete are what the Gospel calls “unforgivable”.

And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but he that shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, nor in the world to come. 

~Matthew 12:32~

I don’t know about you, but I would much rather be on the side of favor by the Holy Ghost. It’s always a good sign in a soul that they have the Holy Ghost, when the soul loves Mary, and vice versa. If you have Mary, you have Her Spouse. They work together in all things, and as we approach this divine mystery in Her upcoming feast of the Immaculate Conception, this title alone is Her shared title with the Holy Ghost.

Let me give you an example of how quickly the Holy Ghost works with His Spouse, Our Lady of Seven Sorrows, by praying Her Seven Sorrows Rosary daily and DAILY invoking these Gifts of the Holy Ghost, in a every day scenario. When I hear what Saint Paul says of the ones we must avoid, who make “pleasing speeches and good words” and “seduce the hearts of the innocent” (Romans 16) I immediately pay attention to my “senses” and how they react. I use the 5 Senses of Our Lord.

If Mary and the Holy Ghost are warning me a person’s advice should be accepted or rejected, I know immediately (that is the Gift of Counsel). What is incredible about that “gift” is there are times I have had no evidence to support my claim that someone is a fraud and can’t be trusted, but I go with that gift of counsel anyways and I can’t tell you how many times I was proven right when the evidence DID eventually come out later, and I saw how I was protected. It produces nothing but sheer gratitude on these occasions.

It’s the same when people, even priests, give me unsolicited advice. I “observe” how the five senses of Our Lord, in my interior, react to their advice. I either “sense” a direct thumbs up from Our Lord or a direct thumbs down, where I know when to accept or reject what the person is saying and move on. This is not disobedience. On the contrary it is Catholic maturity:

Example of what seems to be good advice in The Lord of the Rings, but Frodo’s discernment knows better:

Boromir: “I know why you seek solitude. You suffer; I see it day by day. You sure you do not suffer needlessly? There are other ways, Frodo, other paths that we might take.

Frodo: “I know what you would say. And it would seem like wisdom but for the warning in my heart.”

Frodo acknowledges Boromir’s well-intentioned but ultimately Ring-influenced advice (likely about using the Ring for good or taking it to Gondor) but his own heart senses the true danger, recognizing that even seemingly wise counsel regarding the Ring leads to ruin. It highlights Frodo’s growing understanding and resistance to the Ring’s temptation, even when offered by a friend, showing his wisdom isn’t just intellect but deep intuition. 

Apply all this to Sister Lucia being replaced. There was a time when we did not have all the forensic evidence we indeed have, now, to prove there were two Sister Lucys and those are indeed the times we should be able to simply rely on our own eyes (senses) and gifts of the Holy Ghost. My point is there are going to be plenty of other times that we will have to come to such quick conclusions in the moment when we are dealing with false prophets and anti Christs. Those that appear to us in sheep’s clothing. What are you going to do then?

The sad truth is, the Church today has grown lukewarm and “disinterested”. Such laziness is tied to “charity grown cold” (Matthew 24). Proof of such Pharaoh type “hardness of heart” looks like this comment about Sister Lucia:

“Whether or not there are two different people, I don’t care. The message of Fatima is of the main concern.”

You don’t care? Is that really what we as a Church have come to? Let’s put aside that Mary chose to appear to Lucia and just remember the fact that Lucia de Santos is a human being. If we as a flock simply turned to Our Lady’s Seven Sorrows every day and invoked the 7 gifts of the Holy Ghost, I promise you that the gifts of fear of God, piety, wisdom, understanding, knowledge, counsel and fortitude would indeed be our weapons of virtue against powers and principalities and we would see things clearly and have the courage to do what’s right. Unfortunately, evil continues to endure through FRAUD because good people do nothing. I pray the Seven Sorrows Rosary for a number of reasons. One of those reasons is due to one of Her Seven Promises of:

“I will defend them in their spiritual battles with the infernal enemy and I will protect them at every instant of their lives.”

I repeat: EVERY INSTANT OF THEIR LIVES. We have been given weapons to fight the fraud in our times: Seven Sorrows Rosary, 5 Senses of the Holy Face of Jesus and 7 Gifts of the Holy Ghost. What are you waiting for? Start now, and pray for justice for the real Sister Lucia of Fatima who indeed was a victim soul for the triumph of Mary’s Immaculate Heart- the first of many!

Please take a moment to check out my friend Wynn’s hard work and consider supporting Sister Lucy Truth and Dr. Peter!

AVE MARIA, CHRIST IS KING!

Footnotes:

From Wynn: I mentioned the Fatima Crusader – It is actually in issue 132 where they FINALLY admit that there was an imposter- Here.

They did so grudgingly – and have been quiet about it since.

Dr. Robert Bennett’s new report, which has GROK actually analyzing the photographic and handwriting evidence in the Sister Lucy case. Result? When considering only the evidence, it finds a greater than 95% probability that there was an Imposter Sister Lucy Here.

Commenter on the Latest SLT Niles video

Based solely on data, logic, and consequences, the claim that the Carmelite nun known as Sister Lucia from 1967 until her death in 2005 is the same individual as the Fatima seer prior to 1960 has a measurable probability of less than 1%. The likelihood that all the post-1960 changes occurred naturally within the same person, without external intervention, is 0.86%, meaning there is a 99.14% probability of replacement or misrepresentation. This conclusion emerges from the combined weight of multiple independent expert findings, summarized as follows:

1. Forensic Facial Analysis
A licensed facial biometrics expert (a U.S. Army-trained photo-anthropometrist) conducted side-by-side analysis of authenticated pre-1960 and post-1967 photos of Sister Lucia. Measured differences include a shortened philtrum (area between nose and upper lip), wider jaw, reduced nasolabial fold, changed tooth structure, and altered eyebrow arch and eye shape. These measurements exceed natural aging expectations or effects of dental prosthetics. Estimated probability of natural change: 60% .

2. Handwriting Analysis
Two independent handwriting experts—one a certified forensic document examiner—analyzed dozens of letters pre-1960 and post-1967. They found radical differences in letter formation, slant, pressure, and signature style. The divergence between the two hands would not be explainable by aging, illness, or even disguise. Probability of natural shift: 50% .

3. Personality Shift and Public Exposure
The pre-1960 Lucia lived under strict papal enclosure as a cloistered Carmelite, inaccessible to the public. The post-1967 Lucia appeared in multiple public photo-ops, smiling and speaking openly. Such a drastic personality inversion—without any public explanation, canonical release from enclosure, or documented trauma—carries a probability of natural occurrence: 50%.

4. Theological Reversal
The early Lucia issued repeated urgent warnings: about the Third Secret, global chastisement, and Our Lady’s requirement for a specific papal consecration of Russia. The later Lucia retroactively affirmed the 1984 consecration as sufficient and made no further public appeals. Given the radical difference in tone, urgency, and theological content, probability of natural doctrinal alignment: 40%.

5. Eyewitness and Public Recognition Gaps
No major public figure, family member, or pre-1960 witness has testified under oath to the continuous identity of Sister Lucia. Key family members expressed private doubts. There are no video or photographic records of her public presence between 1959 and 1967. This blackout period coincides precisely with the post-conciliar shift. Probability of such discontinuity under normal circumstances: 50%.

6. Institutional Utility of Change
The later Lucia aligned perfectly with the Vatican’s post-conciliar messaging, notably affirming that the Third Secret had already been fulfilled and promoting ecumenical harmony. This transition served to neutralize Fatima’s apocalyptic warnings. Probability of alignment without orchestration: 40%.

Stacked Probability Calculation:
0.6 × 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 = 0.0086 = 0.86%

Thus, the probability that all these major changes could occur naturally in the same individual without institutional orchestration is less than 1%. Therefore, the likelihood of a replacement or staged impersonation is 99.14%.

Christine’s video, while sincere, does not address the measurable data presented by forensic experts in facial biometrics or handwriting analysis. It relies on subjective interpretation, absence of suspicion, and generalized reasoning, without addressing the lack of DNA, photographic continuity, or public verification between 1959 and 1967. No counter-experts are cited. No effort is made to refute the physical impossibilities raised by image alignment software or signature analysis.

Historically, while there is no identical precedent for an individual impersonation on this scale in Church history, the suppression or manipulation of visionaries is well documented—e.g., the silencing of Melanie of La Salette, and the secret withholding of the Third Secret of Fatima itself until 2000. While impersonation would be an extreme escalation, it must be judged based on evidence, not assumptions of impossibility.

All of the above is presented with reverence toward the Church’s true magisterium, compassion for all involved, and a commitment to truth. No judgment is made on the souls or intentions of those responsible, but the data speak clearly: Sister Lucia was almost certainly replaced or misrepresented after 1960. This conclusion is supported not by conspiracy, but by six independent lines of objective, measurable evidence.