“Charity dictates that we tell people the truth. Jesus established one Church, period end of story.”
~My friend Richard~
What do Protestants and Jews have in common? BOTH boast. Protestants boast of their salvation and the Jews boast of their DNA. “We’re the chosen people.” Respectfully, shut up! No, you’re not.
What does Saint Paul say about boasting? He warns us not to boast because we can easily be a branch broken off from the root of the olive tree. He reminds us that we do not sustain the root, the root sustains us. That kind of debunks the whole “once saved always saved, born again Christian mumbo jumbo”, doesn’t it? Paul therefore came to the conclusion that if he were to boast about anything, that it would be in his infirmity- his weakness. Talk about humility! But to boast in anything other than your weakness, is pride indeed.
In fact, one of my biggest pet peeves I have is when I hear people say of a friend or relative, “they are in heaven, now” with absolute certainty and finality. It’s utterly prideful because the only One Who has the authority on the seat of Divine Judgement Who can say such a statement is the God Man. Stop placing yourself in HIS shoes, er, sandals. That’s not humility, but presumption. This is when I was reminded of Saint John Vianney’s powerful words about departed souls. Fitting since the commemoration of All Souls is vast approaching:
If you’re a Protestant reading this post, there are trigger warnings ahead, and I humbly ask you to read this blog in its entirety and honestly reflect on what I have written with an open heart and mind.
Saint Paul’s description of the Jews:
“Even as they have from the Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men; prohibiting us to speak to the Gentiles that they may be saved, to fill up their sins always: for the wrath of God has come upon them to the end.”
1 Thessalonians 2:14–16
If you think that this statement is terribly “antisemitic” of Saint Paul or that he was a “self hating Jew”, you’re definitely in the wrong lane. In fact, you’re in the danger zone. It’s time to get out of the car and stop driving altogether. We always know we have heresy on our hands when someone has a problem with Paul. Most of the time, it’s Protestants and Jews. My dear friend Richard who I started the quote with had this to say about the Gentile Prince’s statement on the Jews:
Clearly, they are the threat, not the Chinese, not the Russians, not the Iranians, not the Venezuelans, not the Nicaraguans, not Panama, not the Koreans, not the Vietnamese, not the Syrians, not Iraq or any of the other dozens of countries we have invaded.
Mic drop.
As I have written before, Richard acts as my own personal Saint Paul by driving me to Latin Mass; he gets me to The Wedding! We have the most lively conversations about many different topics on the Church, the country and the state of things. We often discuss the name the Catholic Church has given to the Jews which is used in the Saint Andrew’s pre 50s Mass Missal when we pray for their conversion, and that is “perfidious Jews”. Perfidious… is a pretty nasty name to be called. And it’s fits the Jews entirely. They have completely earned that name. They should probably get a trophy. It means treacherous, duplicitous and purposely deceitful. Which falls in line exactly with the words of Saint Paul. Yes, it was the Jews who killed Jesus and the prophets; it’s the Jews that are “adversaries to all men” UNTIL THE END. Until their conversion, promised in the Book of the Apocalypse, they will be man kind’s greatest enemy. Satan’s tool.
The United States of Israel was recently trying to get a bill passed that would deem the Gospels “antisemitic”… for portraying the Jews with such accuracy. Heaven forbid we expose their “treachery”! Jesus Christ the perfect Jew, identified Himself as the divine SAMARITAN to pave the way for His New Covenant established in His Precious Blood: the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. Where, as Saint John described, is no longer one of royal blood: being of the Abrahamic blood line, but one of grace. Interesting that THIS Gospel is said nearly everyday at the end of Latin Mass, unless another Gospel is read. Is that to serve as a reminder? That it’s no longer about race, but grace through the sacraments. We no longer go to Jerusalem to offer blood sacrifices, but houses were to be established everywhere, to the four corners of the earth for the unbloody sacrifice of the Mass. As Saint Paul also said, the Jews that were cut off from the tree, were replaced by the gentiles who were grafted in by grace. The Olive Tree is Jesus Christ and the roots are the Catholic Church where the supply of grace flows to the branches.
It was no longer about race, but GRACE through the sacraments Jesus established through His apostles carried on in the priesthood. Only the Catholic Church’s priesthood has apostolic succession and authority through the sacraments. No other valid priesthood established by Christ exists outside of the Church He founded. If you reject Jesus Christ, you’re a vine broken off from the branches. What else do Protestants and Jews have in common? They both reject the Catholic Church established by Jesus the Bridegroom, which is the Ark of the New Covenant. To reject His Covenant, is to reject Jesus. If you reject the Church His bride, you reject Jesus, and vice versa. So, stop BOASTING, you BOASTFUL Protestants and perfidious Jews. Until you’re properly grafted into the Church Jesus Christ founded, through the Olive Tree of the grace of the sacraments, you’re a heretic in need of conversion. I wouldn’t be so blunt if they were not so boastful. Even we Catholics know that everyday we must work out our salvation with fear and trembling, remembering that salvation is NOT a gift that is given to us in a single moment of conversion. It’s something we have to HUMBLY work out throughout our life time EVERY SINGLE DAY. NOW, and at the hour of our death.
I told Richard we absolutely needed an adjective to describe Protestants, as well and on the drive to Mass it hit me: “boastful Protestants.” “Boastful Protestants” and “perfidious Jews”.
We need to reinforce Jesus’ identity as Bridegroom to better understand my name choices. It’s all over the bible. Old and New Testament. The Church as bride is prefigured since the beginning, as well. If you visit the Holy Sepulcher today, the title given to Jesus is “Bridegroom” in Greek. As Isaiah wrote: “your Creator will be your Husband.”
When John the Baptist was asked who the Messiah is, he famously replied with “the One Who has the bride is the Bridegroom” (John 3:29). Essentially that means, He Who has the Church is Jesus. John identifies himself as the “friend of the Bridegroom”. Jesus famously scolded the Pharisees when they asked why He and the apostles don’t fast and He said one cannot fast when the Bridegroom is with them. Bridegroom in Jewish weddings were known to be charged with supplying the wine. At Cana, Jesus identified Himself as Bridegroom by supplying the wine. It’s so important to note that Jesus’ FIRST act of a public miracle was in identifying Himself as Bridegroom. Of course we also have the Parable of the Virgins with that part many forget of the Bridegroom coming WITH THE BRIDE to meet the virgins. Are you starting to notice a powerful theme, here? If you’re a Protestant, Jew… and even a Catholic reading this and you didn’t know Jesus was fulfilling the prophecy of coming in the Flesh as Bridegroom, then this only proves why Jesus and His Church are entirely misunderstood, even 2,000 years later.
Here’s a walk down memory lane. Remember when I wrote this below excerpt in a previous post?
One of the many reasons Protestantism is so insulting to Our Lord is because Jesus, as faithful Husband and Bridegroom has only ONE BRIDE, which He founded (the Catholic Church) is depicted as One in favor of divorce. Though she, His bride, may be unfaithful, He is not. What Protestantism represents in a nutshell is one thing: DIVORCE. Each Protestant “church” represents a type of perverted “bride” and if we look at this in its proper context, this would be like Our Lord DIVORCING the Catholic Church.
Protestants depict Our Lord as divorcing His one and only bride when He finds her unfaithful (through the mystery of iniquity), and remarrying another “church”, then another, and another, and another because look how many “sects” of Protestant “churches” founded by man have been the result of this “divorce”.
Protestants actually depict Our Lord as the unfaithful Bridegroom, Who, once He tires of His bride, marries a new “church”.
Once the Protestants and Jews understand that Jesus Christ came in the Flesh to fulfill the prophecies of God becoming BRIDEGROOM, just as God was known as the Bridegroom to the Synagogue before coming in the Flesh to establish His Church, then it becomes clear that just as there is only one faith, one baptism, one Shepherd, one flock, there can only be one bride, one Church. As Saint Paul described Jesus as ONE Husband. When we see EVERYTHING through the lens of Jesus being Bridegroom, and apply this below verse to Him from Matthew 19 when He is questioned by the Pharisees on His view of divorce, it becomes even more radically clear why He will never divorce His Church:
And there came to Him the Pharisees tempting Him, and saying: Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause? 4 Who answering, said to them: Have ye not read, that He who made man from the beginning, made them male and female? And He said: 5 For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and they two shall be in one flesh.
6 Therefore now they are not two, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let no man put asunder. 7 They say to Him: Why then did Moses command to give a bill of divorce, and to put away? 8He saith to them: Because Moses by reason of the hardness of your heart permitted you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.
This is where it dawned on me that BOTH Protestants and Jews also have a problem with Jesus’ teaching on the “flesh”. Saint Paul refers to Jesus and the Church as “two in one flesh” in his letter to the Ephesians. Many, even Catholics, are very uncomfortable at the word “flesh” being written, so they say things like “two in one.” No… the exact words of Saint Paul are two in ONE FLESH. He refers to it as a “mystery” and a “sacrament” in Christ and the Church. Paul talks about the nourishing and cherishing of the flesh precisely because we are part of Our Lord’s Flesh and Bones, again, all per Paul! This mystery can be compared to the great controversy of Jesus in John 6 saying that those who do not eat His Flesh and drink His Blood, do not have life in them.
We know this was not a symbol or metaphor because Jesus didn’t back down, rather He doubled down and said, “truly I say to you, My Flesh is true food and My blood is true drink.” He even lost disciples that day as we read in scripture. If He was speaking figuratively He easily could have cleared the air. No. Our Lord didn’t apologize. Instead He turned to the Apostles and asked if they were going to leave, too. Peter our first pope admitted it was a hard teaching, and chose to believe without understanding everything, yet. That is faith! Also a humility. 2,000 years later, we understand the Eucharist is indeed our true Food and true Drink. But imagine being in the beginning stages of that teaching? It’s truly a humility because the Apostles had to be willing to lose even their reputations for seemingly embracing cannibalism. It’s easier for us present day Catholics to grasp the Eucharist, but here we are 2,000 years later and it’s still a teaching not accepted by Protestants and Jews.
What’s so important to note is that when Paul wrote his letter to the Ephesians about the Church being “two in one flesh” with Jesus Christ, Ephesus was the home of Mary, and history shows us that Saint Paul had a tender devotion to Her and was constantly returning to see Her. Who, besides Jesus, more than anyone understood this great “sacrament”? MARY. Our Lady of Fatima said that more souls go to hell for SINS OF THE FLESH than for any other reason, and that is when Aflavia told me that this means THE FLESH is then the holiest. God always rises up something to combat the greatest vices. Its sins of the flesh verses VIRTUES of the flesh. Now it makes sense why Lucia said the final battle with Satan will be ON MARRIAGE. Now that we understand that Jesus came in the FLESH AS BRIDEGROOM, and Saint Paul describes Jesus and the Church being TWO IN ONE FLESH, as a sacrament, then naturally Satan is going to zero in on perverting the flesh through sexual deviancy and actual eating of human flesh as we see through human trafficking, today. It’s all a perversion to the things MOST SACRED TO JESUS THE BRIDEGROOM.
1.) Marriage, two in one flesh
2.) Eating His Flesh in the Eucharist
Since Jesus established Himself as Bridegroom and created for Himself a “glorious Church, not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy, and without blemish”… then for Him to in turn divorce her, is blasphemous and heretical. This is the great sin of Protestants in a nutshell. Jesus promised that His Church would be established on the Rock of Peter and that the gates of hell would NEVER prevail against her. To stop believing this, is a lack of faith, and is essentially calling Our Lord a liar. Yikes! Would not want to be on board that Protestant ship.
In conclusion, the Catholic Church, the NEW ARK of the covenant, just like Noah’s ARK, is the boat to which outside there is NO salvation. Like Noah’s Ark, if you do not board the ship established by Jesus Christ, you won’t make it Home. This boastful attitude of “I don’t need His Ark of the Sacraments, I just need Jesus” is prideful. There is an obedience problem. “Not everyone who says to Me ‘Lord, Lord’ shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven, but he who does the will of My Father.” In order to truly understand the bible, we have to remember where it came from. In the 300s it was none other than Pope Damasus with the help of Saint Jerome, that the new canon of scripture was composed. If it weren’t for the Catholic Church, we would still only have the Jewish canon of scripture. Any bible that even a Protestant has the privilege of reading today (albeit with missing books), is thanks to a Catholic Pope, successor of Saint Peter. The Church didn’t come from the bible, the bible came from the Church. As the old saying goes, “to be steeped in history is to cease being a Protestant.” There’s no way one will ever convince me, that God established a House through King Solomon, and a specific ceremonial guide in Leviticus that was filled with specific instructions… to now having “Pastor Todd” and his ripped jeans giving a “sermon” at bible club on Sunday’s. The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, centered on Jesus’ FLESH, is prefigured all over the Old Testament.
Buildings matter because we are HOUSING Jesus the Bridegroom. Buildings matter so much that one of the Old Testament Laws was to dwell in tents as a REMINDER of their wilderness days when they didn’t have the solid walls yet. Why don’t we just have the humility to follow the Laws He gave us? ALL truly goes back to humility. Learn to boast in your weakness. Remember that God is I AM, and He does not change. If the woman at the well was told of her sins of multiple marriages and living with a man outside of marriage, the same sins exist today. The difference with the woman at the well and today’s Protestants is she didn’t make excuses for her sins. THAT is humility. Boastfulness is a hidden and deep sign of insecurity. For true security in God doesn’t require boasting. One truly secure in Jesus and Mary, doesn’t act “chosen”. True holiness is the example lived out in our lives, rather than what we say. My Grandmother was absolutely right when she said Protestants are notorious for telling you all they do and pray, as if to convince themselves they are saved. She said it makes her feel bad. It doesn’t make me feel bad, it makes me righteously angry, and even annoyed. One, because if that makes others feel bad, it proves my boasting argument. We are truly living in a time of UNHOLY freedom and rebellion, and that is because Protestants and Jews are working together, even if not intentionally. We see that taking place in America today, a land founded on Freemasonic fraud and Protestant “values” that now supplies money and weapons to the fraudulent “state of 1948 Israel.”
Therefore, until they convert to Jesus’ One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, the Ark of Salvation, the bride to which He is Bridegroom, I personally will boast in my infirmity AND in calling them perfidious Jews and boastful Protestants. They have earned those adjectives.
